Jans, you bring up a good point about preferring a
"purely poetic documentary" and I think I may have preferred one as
well—but only because I am aware of the reality of global warming/climate
change. I don't necessarily need a person (Balog) there to bring that
humanistic relation to the photographic evidence, which is what I think Orlowski
could have been trying to do when he focused on Balog’s knee injury and family.
Since it was emphasized that people don't believe in climate
change, making Balog the main character seems to have tied the nature in, in a
way that people would actually believe his photographs and believe climate
change is real—rather than just seeing pictures of ice (or lack of) in a National
Geographic magazine. The results of Balog’s project are indeed magnificent, but the film
was about Balog’s survey project and how his project is the story of nature. If
he wasn’t the focus, I don’t think people who see this film would have the opportunity to realistically experience a type of intimate connection that humans and nature possess--and, those who are in denial about the issue may not have the chance to change perspective if the story was not told from Balog's perspective.
I do think Chasing Ice is my favorite film so far. I also
think that from my own opinion of documentary, Chasing Ice is the epitome of
it. There is a clear story here with a distinct beginning, middle and end. It’s
a story about how these images were captured and why.
This is the way I see it: (Beginning/issue) People don’t
believe climate change, but Balog notices ice retreat and wants to photograph
it to aware the public; (Middle/conflict) First 6 months into project are a
waste, camera’s timers don’t work, had to figure out what was wrong and how to
fix them; (End/resolution) Made new software for camera, second round of photos
worked, beautiful yet frightening pictures were captured, and now the visuals
can bring the public awareness on our reality. Project is a success.
Tiara! I like your analysis so well. One thing that good criticism can do is make you rethink your initial assessment of a film. You make a good point for the work the film was doing. Somewhere in the middle of the film. Balog even said he had been a skeptic with regard to climate change, which ties right in to your thesis. I am more impressed with the film (as it stands, not in my fantasy film world) now. Nice post! (and that's a cute pic of you guys and the coach!)
ReplyDelete